Swati Goel Sharma
(This is a reprint from NewsBred).
Should we start with the message or the messenger?
Let’s begin with the messenger first. I bet none of you know who are 49 signatories who have written to Prime Minister Narendra Modi on minority lynchings. It’s not in your newspapers nor in established magazines such as Outlook and India Today.
Just a coincidence? Or a plot?
I somehow dug up the list of 49 eminent personalities. Over 40 are from the state of West Bengal, including Aparna Sen and Goutam Ghose who have been questioned by CBI on Ponzi schemes. The rest, such as Shobha Mudgal, Ramachandra Guha, Adoori Gopalakrishnan, Anurag Kashyap and Mani Ratnam are known Leftists. Madam Mamata Banerjee has come out in support of this letter though your newspaper wouldn’t have mentioned it. Telegraph India? The known Leftist rag from Kolkata? Oh, you must look for its Epaper today. Or curl up your lips by looking at this image of their front page below.
I am not “rubbishing” the messenger to “kill” the message. Human lives are above ideology. Blood has no religion. Not for these worthies though. They could only see Muslim blood. Or they would have followed Anand Ranganathan or Swati Goel Sharma and known of hundreds of cases against Hindus and Dalits; or educated themselves on the pieces from OpIndia which lists 50 hate-crimes by Muslims in recent times; and a dozen “incidents” against Muslims which turned out to be fake.
Yet, they are quoting factcheker.in as their source when the website is epitome of lies, mischief and propaganda. They have a problem with the word “urban naxals” (made famous by Vivek Ranjan Aghinotri) who they view as “dissenter” but the nation as “subversive” and a threat to India’s sovereignty. They view “Jai Shri Ram” as a “war cry” but Islamic terrorists blowing themselves up with “Allah O Akbar” on the lips is our sheer imagination.
Yet, these worthies deserve our time. Just to exhibit how the “Deep State” works. Let me list 10 questions which must prod the conscience of neutral Indian citizens:
- Why we don’t have the list of 49 in public domain?
- Why the headlines have tried to give it a Pan-Indian intellectual “uprising” hiding its essentially Bengali flavour?
- Why this discourse omits crimes against the Hindus?
- Why known Hindu intellectuals—Rajiv Malhotra, Subhash Kak, David Frawley, Dr Koenrad Elst, Francois Gautier–are never invited in Express Adda or TV debates?
- Could you remember anyone of them reacting to vandalizing of Durga Maa Temple in the heart of Capital recently?
- Why politicians such as Arvind Kejriwal, Rahul Gandhi, Sitaram Yechury, Mamata Banerjee or Yadavs are never outraged at the crimes against the Hindus
- Are NGOs a part of this nexus? At 31 lakhs, the NGOs in our counry are double the number of schools; 250 times the number of government hospitals. We have one NGO for 400 people as against one policeman for 709 persons.
- Where were these intellectuals, newspapers and politicians and NGOs when crimes against Muslims and Dalits were far worse in UPA’s 10 years than it has been in Modi’s five-plus?
- And if these intellectuals, newspapers, politicians and NGOs are working in complete sync, ensuring what we read and what we don’t; what stops us from terming them as a “Deep State” within India?
- And if this “Deep State” exists, it just can’t be ideology. (More so when Left is as good as politically over in India). Who does this “Deep State” belong to? CIA? Saudi money? Commie funds? Or all of them put together? Or deep pockets of imperialism masquerading as Liberal Order?
The dangers are obvious. As the divide between Hindus and Muslims grow deeper; the spin-off could begin with lives lost or India divided, 1947 revisited. With people at war, India would get terminally weak. Those plotting it would be happy beyond words. Those who want Hinduism crushed would be over the moon.
Hindus of course can’t match them in propaganda. They are deep-rooted: The “Deep State: have their artistes, intellectuals, historians and media planted everywhere around us. They have a ready audience at home and abroad. The narrative would stay with them in foreseeable future. This has been a project of decades. The monster can’t be slayed overnight.
Sure it needs response. An organized response. Democracy is one tool which has rolled these worthies into the ground. But we are putting too many eggs in one basket. Democracy can be subverted (Why do you think they cry so much on EVMs?). We have also seen how technological giants, such as Google, Twitter, Amazon etc promote such Break-India forces. Our culture is still a binding force but when “Jai Shri Ram” is turned into an abuse, it’s only a matter of time before it implodes. India is young and they are easily brain-washed (All those with teenagers at home would identify with this issue).
Frankly, Hindus need a George Soros to combat these forces. Those who don’t know him, should do it now. He fronts Liberal Order; Hindus need one of their own. It’s unlikely BJP or RSS would be of much help in terms of funds or a commitment for decades. But Hindus would be increasingly under siege and only an organized structure, and not stray organic counter-voices, could set them free.
(This is a reprint from NewsBred).
So, nobody threw the skullcap. Nobody taunted Mohammad Barkat Alam in Gurugram for being a Muslim. Nobody asked him to chant “Jai Shri Ram.”
Don’t take my word for it. Nor of the police. You haven’t seen CCTV footage too. But at least believe Alam on whose behalf Lutyens Media reserved headlines as big as they would if World War III has broken out.
Alam, in his FIR, doesn’t say that his skull cap was thrown on the street. He doesn’t complain that he was asked to chant “Jai Shri Ram.” Lutyens Media had quoted Alam that two people, and four on motorcycles, had cornered him. CCTV footage shows only one person. The entire incident is of 1.30-2 minutes.
There is such daylight between what media reported Alam to have said and what he actually reported in his FIR that police has no doubt “somebody tutored him (Alam).” Police is emphatic: “It’s not a communal incident.”
In short, IT WAS A HOAX.
But google search Barkat Alam. You would only find headlines of Barkat Alam and his skullcap, how Gautam Gambhir is indignant at this communal attack. Ask your friends, relatives any common man. All of them would froth at the injustice to Barkat Alam, only because he was a Muslim.
This is not a one-off incident. Swati Goel Sharma of Swarajyamag has compiled a twitter thread on hoax hate-crimes against Muslims reported in Lutyens Media. These are the crimes where Muslims have raised the bogey of victimhood and Lutyens Media have spun a yarn.
But lo and behold: the nation stops. Sardesais and Shekhars grid up the lions. Sagarikas and Barkhas have their lipsticks smudged due to mouthfuls. Rahul Gandhis and Arvind Kejriwals are never far off. Cameras whir; mikes glisten in sun and celebrities are on the street with placards (The picture in this article is of Shabana Azmi and hers “Not In My Name” on the tragic death of Junaid–but not on beef narrative that Liberals had run away with).
Like Barkat Alam, there is Misbah Qadri, a Muslim woman in Mumbai. After BJP came to power in 2014, Qadri claimed she was being forced to leave her rental flat by a property broker. The broker went underground, fearing for his life.
Soon the facts emerged. Qadri wasn’t vacating her rented house. Property-broker had filed a case against her a month before Qadri whipped her narrative. The very building housed several Muslims and none had a complaint against the property-broker. The police concluded there was no evidence in support of Qadri.
The fallout? None. Lutyens Media behaved as if nothing had happened. No sorry for a hoax story, no apology to the broker who could’ve been killed. The hate-Muslim narrative is too nourishing for a few, you see.
Then there is this 22-year-old Umam Khanam, a law student in Meerut, Uttar Pradesh. She had taken the social media by storm in narrating her ordeal: how she was molested by fellow students in a bus for being a Muslim, for not wearing a “Lotus” cap. She blamed her teachers for allowing students to get away with vulgarity and lewd comments. You would remember the indignation amongst our liberals. Indeed, everyone, including you and me, was offended. Saffron and lotus had another brush with the “outcast” syndrome. The heavens fell.
Then the facts emerged. It was again a Muslim-hate-crime hoax. Nothing supported Khanam’s claims. When the Muslim-girl was asked to show up for an internal inquiry committee, she skipped it. Most students gave written statements calling out her lies. Indeed, investigations revealed that she was a rabid Muslim zealot and hated BJP. Her social media posts corroborated her profile: hatred for “bhakts” to the extent she wished death for them. Her tweets wished for the lynching of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. She asked BJP supporters to go and dring “gau mutra” (cow-urine).
Nobody approves of hate crimes. The perpetrators must pay for such crimes. But equally criminal is to make a distinction between Muslim and Hindu victims. See crime from the communal lenses. Every day an incident or two happens in a nation of 1.3 billion people. Sometimes Hindus suffer, sometimes Muslims. But it ought not to be a pretext to cook up hate-Muslim crimes. Western media is ever-ready to make a meal out of it. To show Hindus are rabid. Minority is in danger in India. India is back to Dark AGes. The India of Nehru is over. But when the lie is called out, all guns fall silent. Lutyens Media move on to next hate-Muslim crime-hoax as if nothing happened. No course-correction, no apology, NOTHING.
As an aside, check the tweets of Lutyens Media and its’ crusaders if they have reacted to the assault on “Freedom of Press” in Karnataka where an editor is facing jail for doing a story on Gowdas. Do imagine if it was a BJP government and not of Congress-JD(S).
(P.S: Again, do read to the admirable thread of Swati Goel Sharma. Such are journalists who are the real “chowkidars” of India).